Share this article:
Print

Metro weighs impact of high-speed rail system

Click here for a free download of the latest Adobe Flash Player.

by Teresa Blackman

Bio | Email | Follow: @KGWNews

kgw.com

Posted on February 9, 2010 at 10:47 AM

Updated Tuesday, Feb 9 at 2:11 PM

Poll:
Would you ride on a high-speed train between Portland and Seattle?

PORTLAND – State lawmakers and city leaders discussed the future of high-speed rail service in Oregon during a meeting Tuesday in Portland.

The meeting began at 10 a.m., at Portland’s Union Station. The agenda – discussing the federal stimulus project and $600 million earmarked for the Northwest, with most of it going to Washington state.

Background: Northwest gets $598-million for high-speed rail projects

Lawmakers said they believe the project will generate around 6,000 Northwest jobs.

Interactive: U.S. high-speed rail map

Metro President David Bragdon explained how high-speed rail can sync up with Portland's existing transit infrastructure, and a representative from Congressman Blumenauer’s office outlined the federal commitment to high-speed rail.

Jenn Lavelle, a spokesperson for the Oregon State Public Interest Group, also known as OSPIRG, explained how high-speed rail in Oregon has the potential to create tens of thousands of jobs, alleviate congestion, and reduce carbon emissions. “The new OSPIRG report will highlight these benefits and recommend further commitment to high speed rail development,” she said.

Officials also released ‘The Right Track’ during the meeting, a new OSPIRG research report which quantifies the benefits of high speed rail and sets recommendations for future investments.

Share this article:
Print

To add a comment, please register or login.

Leave your comment
1000 characters remaining

Submit

We welcome your comments on this story's topic. Off-topic comments, personal attacks, and inappropriate language may be flagged and removed, and comment privileges blocked, per our Terms of Service. Thanks for keeping the comments space respectful.

Privacy Policy

HTML is not allowed.

You have indicated this comment should be removed.

Close

The comment has been submitted for review. Thank you .

Comments: Displaying 1 - 8 of 8

bubbapdx said on February 10, 2010 at 8:57 AM

The primary problem with the train now is that the passenger train uses tracks owned by the freight train companies which makes Amtrak unreliable and not practical for many would be users. If they can resolve the on-time issue more people will take the train. There is congestion between Portland and Seattle and Portland and Medford and it is NOT restricted to cities. I have a solution to resolve this and it's fairly simple... crack down on the people driving slowly in the fast lane. That is a key source of non-city congestion and it's simple to fix. If you start slapping $300 tickets for puttering along in the left lane at 55 in a 70 mph zone you will quickly change behavior. Keep Right - Pass Left. It's really not that difficult (for most of us).

37362941
Flag this comment

notsocasual said on February 9, 2010 at 7:10 PM

How in the name of all that is holy would a high speed rail system reduce congestion? Congestion is caused by LOCAL traffic and this type of rail is designed to move people between MAJOR CITIES (Vancouver to San Diego would be a WONDERFUL line to build, hit Seattle, Portland, Ashland, Sacramento, Oakland, LA, but not much more otherwise it's a waste of a good FAST train.) hopefully on isolated tracks where trains can travel at 150MPH or better (200 would be great but I don't want to push it). But in order for this to work we MUST build an infrastructure that FEEDS the train, not COMPETES WITH IT. That's the problem with MAX and the bus system; they compete, they don't COMPLIMENT. It's called planning and for the great number of planners in this area it seems that most of them suffer from a rectal-cranial inversion.

37333291
Flag this comment

southside said on February 9, 2010 at 4:09 PM

Well, cyclepete my job requires that I drive all over the metro area! I live about 2 miles away from my job already. There is nothing but feilds in between. It is rather insensitive of you to think that I should conform to using a bicycle to commute. Bicycles in my job would be immpossable. Trust me I hate driving the freeways in the city and thats because of the lack of progression in expanding them. I do ride a bike and love to ride but that is for exercise.

37323454
Flag this comment

cyclepete said on February 9, 2010 at 3:15 PM

southside, the only way to relieve congestion is if you and everyone else moved closer to your jobs and stayed off the highways. The Interstate highway system was originally built to move military and commerce. Everyone thinks everyone else is the problem with congestion on the highways. Next time you complain about traffic, look in the vanity mirror and you will see the problem of congestion. Everyone who is stuck in a traffic jam is part of the problem.

37318228
Flag this comment

southside said on February 9, 2010 at 2:03 PM

Alleviate congestion? Yea right, think again! Max was supposed to do that and we still have traffic jams most the day. The only way to get rid of the congestion is to add more lanes and smooth out the bottlenecks in our system. Bike lanes will not help with the freeways. I would also create a Westside bypass like I205 up and through longview connecting to I5.

37308909
Flag this comment

exxon4prez said on February 9, 2010 at 1:24 PM

THIS WOULD BE SO SO COOL!!!!

37302139
Flag this comment

baronie said on February 9, 2010 at 12:55 PM

Just wondering, how many City officials rode their bike to the meeting??

37299408
Flag this comment

disenchanted1 said on February 9, 2010 at 11:42 AM

598 $MILLION? not all of that! most is Washington state! but does such funding even exist? except in pork ladden promises? this money as I understand still must be earned and taken [redistributed] from those who earned it! so we'll see? if it happens? discuss all you want!

37293811
Flag this comment