Share this article:
Print

Proposed Vancouver Fire cuts raise safety questions

by Amy Troy

Bio | Email | Follow: @AmyTroy

kgw.com

Posted on February 8, 2010 at 7:46 PM

Updated Tuesday, Feb 9 at 1:14 PM

VANCOUVER, Wash. -- City budget cuts are forcing Vancouver's fire chief to make tough choices.   

Chief Don Bivens must cut nearly $1 million from his 2010 budget and he's trying to avoid layoffs. 

Instead, four fire fighters will retire early and Bivens may scrap the city's only medical response unit, called Rescue 3.   The plan is raising questions about safety because Rescue 3 was put in place years ago to shorten response times on emergency calls. 

Captain Bill Garlington, speaking for the chief, says Rescue 3 is based in one of the city's busiest fire stations.   Station 3 handles 4,500 emergency calls every year and most of them are for medical emergencies.   

He says "the rescue unit was put here to shorten the response times for heart attacks & fires."     Garlington adds, this was the "least worst option" considered by Chief Bivens.

Still, the idea isn't sitting well with the city's fire fighter union.  

Union President Mark Johnston says "it's a terrible game of musical chairs."   

He points to the number of calls at Station 3.     If the rescue unit is cut, engines from other parts of Vancouver will have to drive over to help handle the call load.

"If you take this unit out of service somebody's going to suffer,  somebody having a medical emergency is not going to get the care they need and the care the city council should be providing for all citizens of Vancouver," Johnston adds.     


The union is urging all Vancouver citizens to weigh in on the issue.     

At a downtown Vancouver park parents are talking about the proposed cuts.     

"I know people need to cut somewhere in the budget and I'd like to know what other options there are," Aram Arslanian said.  

Corrina Keebaugh is worried about longer response times should someone call 9-1-1.   "I believe times for engines to get to specific areas will be longer, and having 2 young children response times are important to me."
 

Vancouver's Chief Financial Officer, Lloyd Tyler, says the city council must close a nearly six million dollar budget gap by mid-March.   

The shortfall comes as a result of a decline in sales tax revenue and a cap on property taxes recently approved by voters.   He says the council will take public comment on all proposals until March 15th, when it's scheduled to take action.

 

Share this article:
Print

To add a comment, please register or login.

Leave your comment
1000 characters remaining

Submit

We welcome your comments on this story's topic. Off-topic comments, personal attacks, and inappropriate language may be flagged and removed, and comment privileges blocked, per our Terms of Service. Thanks for keeping the comments space respectful.

Privacy Policy

HTML is not allowed.

You have indicated this comment should be removed.

Close

The comment has been submitted for review. Thank you .

Comments: Displaying 1 - 5 of 5

vancouvernative said on February 9, 2010 at 12:38 PM

Legislators get $90/day in per diem/food costs, but we don't have enough money to fund rescues and FFs. How typical.

37297906
Flag this comment

shallowend said on February 9, 2010 at 9:11 AM

tater, the ambulance company required upwards of 45 minutes to respond to a lot of incidents which isn't helpful in a stroke or heart attack situation. The city was sued (repeatedly) for failing to provide for this. That is what triggered the rescue unit. Having to pay out over $5 million in settlements and lawsuits (plus attorney costs) is really the "excessive cost". (I lived in Vancouver at the time the recue unit was activated, and during the AMR lawsuits and contract arguments.)

37281514
Flag this comment

b8tea said on February 9, 2010 at 9:09 AM

The private sector can fill in the gaps with positioning an extra ambulance in the area and give the taxpayers a break. You don't need the fire engines on every medical call. A first response vehicle, such as a car with a AED and a EMT that knows what he is doing can handle the needs of a small area. Get real Vancouver!

37281378
Flag this comment

iresqu7129944897 said on February 9, 2010 at 8:49 AM

Ok, before this gets out of control: 1) Contact Vancouver Fire or the City & request the official dispatch logs. Compare the response times. Fire units are often on-scene 4-6 minutes before the ambulance. 2) Call YOUR DOCTOR, or some other doctor you trust, & ask them how much 4-6 minutes matters if your infant is choking or your husband/wife is in cardiac arrest. 3) Decide if YOU can live with that. Emergency services are like insurance. You pay for it and pray to god you never need it. Those of you who complain about cost, how much money have you paid over the last 10 years in fire insurance on your house? Has it ever burned down? If not, then by your logic it was a HUGE waste of thousands of your hard earned dollars. If it did.... aren't you glad you had it? ;)

37279876
Flag this comment

common_tater said on February 8, 2010 at 11:06 PM

Of course the union doesn't like the cuts to this duplicative service. It may shine a light on the excessive cost incurred by the public when the fire department got into the emergency medical business. Whenever there is an emergency medical call or accident the private ambulance company responds. They will still respond whether there is a fire department rescue unit or not. This duplication is one of the hidden costs that all taxpayers bear, and it is an exhorbitant cost. The fire department should stick to fire suppression and fire prevention activities and leave the emergency medical calls to the private sector.

37261274
Flag this comment