Share this article:
Print

PPS lays out goals for high school reorganization

Click here for a free download of the latest Adobe Flash Player.

by Scott Burton

Bio | Email | Follow: @@burton_scott

kgw.com

Posted on February 9, 2010 at 7:39 AM

Updated Tuesday, Feb 9 at 10:45 AM

PORTLAND -- How do you decide which Portland high school should close and which should stay open? How do you decide what's best for the future of 11,000 students? Monday night, Portland Public Schools Superintendent Carole Smith set out to define the goals by which to measure success.

On the table is a plan to re-design the district's high school system. Decreasing enrollment has, in Smith's opinion, left the district with too many high schools for too few students. After months of analysis and community comment events, Smith determined that the best path for the district was a series of comprehensive community high schools, smaller focus schools and additional eduction options.

In moving to this system, it's believed several high schools will be closed in the 2011 school year. But which ones, no one knows.

Many parents district-wide have come together over the last several months to voice their support for their neighborhood high school and to learn what their future may hold. Monday night they were heard, but given few answers.

"I don't see that the system's broken, so I'm wondering why they're taking all this time and energy and spending all these dollars to fix something that isn't broken," said parent Lisa Brumm.

"I'd like to see the details of it because I think that would either help calm people down or else get people in affected schools, it would give them the ability to start planning and responding," added parent Bill Jemison.

While some parents have been demanding immediately to know the future of their local school, others have been asking for the process to slow down.  In the middle is Superintendent Smith who said she created five principles she'd like to guide the high school re-design process.

"To increase graduation rates, to close the achievement gap, to inspire and engage all of our students, to ensure that all schools are in high demand and to ensure all students are prepared for success at the next level," Smith explained to school board members.

Before Smith can use these principles as a foundation for high school re-design, she'll need the board's approval. But she was careful to point out, a yes on establishing goals does not equal a yes on a final outcome.

"This resolution asks for endorsement of our direction, but does not predetermine our destination," said Smith.

The board will vote on Smith's proposal March 8th.

Share this article:
Print

To add a comment, please register or login.

Leave your comment
1000 characters remaining

Submit

We welcome your comments on this story's topic. Off-topic comments, personal attacks, and inappropriate language may be flagged and removed, and comment privileges blocked, per our Terms of Service. Thanks for keeping the comments space respectful.

Privacy Policy

HTML is not allowed.

You have indicated this comment should be removed.

Close

The comment has been submitted for review. Thank you .

Comments: Displaying 1 - 11 of 11

jazzysport said on February 9, 2010 at 11:09 PM

Portland has way too many schools for its continued declining enrollment. To put it in a way Portlanders will understand, it is unsustainable. Fewer schools that are right sized, not to small and not too big will be a good thing for PPS. You can actually fund some programs and things that have been cut or not fundable now. If you have 10 people to feed, why would you go out and buy 10 large pizzas when much less will do. PPS is actually trying to save taxpayer dollars. Poeple need to understand that tax revenues cannot support all the buildings in PPS. It simply isn't affordable, even if you cut all administrators salary it would be a drop in the bucket. It is time Portand parents realize all their neighborhood schools simply cannot be funded anymore. I totally realize their dismay but the fact is, families are leaving the city limits. Instead of being angry at PPS board members they should direct their anger at city hall for not being business friendly instead of tax happy.

37342886
Flag this comment

eastern said on February 9, 2010 at 2:47 PM

Hey veganpeace - gotta admit it sounded good! Still chasing that utopian ideal! Namaste

37315093
Flag this comment

pdx_elitist_lib said on February 9, 2010 at 2:37 PM

Finished school in PDX. Went from a 5000-student high school with separate hockey, baseball and football stadiums to a barely-1000 student Portland high school. My first impression was that there were way too many school building in PDX. Middle schools? Why? This change is long overdue. Let's put the limited funds to better use. And removing all this upkeep on infrastructure is a start. Removing all the unnecessary administration that closures will create is another. But I will always pay more to support schools. You want a functioning society? You want someone to refill your oxycodone every 28 days? Well... gotta invest!

37313556
Flag this comment

sick_n_tired said on February 9, 2010 at 2:24 PM

veganpeace - Shouldn't you be eating some granola or something?

37312036
Flag this comment

veganpeace said on February 9, 2010 at 11:12 AM

eastern: What in Goddesses name are you writing about? A well rounded education in these enlightened times should be dismissive on these anachronistic and RethugliKKKan desired subjects such as racist and imperialistic American History, bigoted math and science, and jingoistic English. We in the Prog/Green/Red/Statist/Vegan camps support schooling robust with meaningful subjects such as diversity embracement, cultural awareness, yoga, veganism, group sexual psychology, and progressive political-science. A feelings-based education will prepare our national treasure for the global community we all desire and give birth to future world leaders as found in Co-Presidents Shelly and Barack Hank Obama, Nancy Pelosi, and Fidel Castro. Subsequently, the amount of tax dollars needed to launch our progeny to address these planetary issues is irrelevant-providing that the selfish rich, RethugliKKKans and their Capitalistic twins are paying for it.

37291203
Flag this comment

gonefromptld said on February 9, 2010 at 10:12 AM

drop outs, we need drop outs to make the rest look good. there will allways be drop out. the % goes up and then down but never goes away. We spend too much time and $ on meeting that goes nowere. this is a waste of time and $.

37286381
Flag this comment

eastern said on February 9, 2010 at 10:07 AM

All I want is for my children is to have an all-around education that is rooted in the foundations of English, the sciences, arts and math. Is this really too much to ask? I am not interested in the 'alternative' programs that will not equip my child for the future.

37285911
Flag this comment

rebewebe said on February 9, 2010 at 9:54 AM

what ever they decide, you can bet it will cost us taxpayers.

37284824
Flag this comment

oregonowl said on February 9, 2010 at 9:20 AM

I disagree with closing the achievement gap. Whenever educational opportunities improve, the better students take advantage of the opportunity first, and so the gap widens.

37282313
Flag this comment

shallowend said on February 9, 2010 at 8:59 AM

Scout - I agree (please get a defibrillator, quick!). When the board went outside for the previous superintendent, she shook the district up. New blood is always a good idea, especially when there are systemic problems in an organization (Enron in the private sector, Willamette ESD in the public sector are good examples.)

37280733
Flag this comment

last__boyscout said on February 9, 2010 at 6:59 AM

No details from the superintendent, no deal. We are all expected to "get the problems fixed" in our jobs, or they will find someone that will. The schools have had problems the past 25 years, why not accept some outside advice to fix their problems?

37272228
Flag this comment