Share this article:
Print

Federal regulators approve LNG terminal, governor to appeal

Federal regulators approve LNG terminal, governor to appeal

by By JEFF BARNARD, AP Environmental Writer

Bio | Email | Follow: @KGWNews

kgw.com

Posted on December 18, 2009 at 1:09 PM

Updated Friday, Dec 18 at 1:13 PM

   GRANTS PASS, Ore. (AP) -- Federal regulators approved construction of a liquefied natural gas terminal on Coos Bay on Thursday, and the governor and conservationists said they would try to reverse the decision and were ready to go to federal court if necessary.
   The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission voted 3-1 in Washington, D.C., to approve the Jordan Cove project.
   Ships would deliver the super-cooled gas to a terminal to be built on the North Spit of Coos Bay. The gas would be distributed through a new 230-mile pipeline, also approved by the council, that would cross the bay and hundreds of rivers and creeks to connect with existing networks serving Oregon, Northern California and northern Nevada.
   "The bottom line is there are a lot of environmental impacts to this," said Leslie Adams of Rogue Riverkeeper, a conservation group. "There is no demonstrated need to import fossil fuels when domestic reserves have been discovered and are a lot cheaper than importing this from foreign countries."
   Gov. Ted Kulongoski and Attorney General John Kroger said they would formally ask the commission to reconsider, and appeal to the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals if necessary, as they have already done with another LNG terminal approved by FERC at Bradwood Landing on the lower Columbia River.
   "Today's decision by FERC does not address Oregon's very real concerns about the environmental impact of the pipeline," Kulongoski said in a statement. "The information guiding this decision is woefully inadequate to license a project with such profound potential impacts on the lives of Oregonians."
   Jordan Cove Energy Project, LP, still must buy the terminal site and secure some state and federal permits. The group's Web site says the terminal will employ 60 people, and construction of the pipeline will employ about 450 people over more than three years.
 

Share this article:
Print

To add a comment, please register or login.

Leave your comment
1000 characters remaining

Submit

We welcome your comments on this story's topic. Off-topic comments, personal attacks, and inappropriate language may be flagged and removed, and comment privileges blocked, per our Terms of Service. Thanks for keeping the comments space respectful.

Privacy Policy

HTML is not allowed.

You have indicated this comment should be removed.

Close

The comment has been submitted for review. Thank you .

Comments: Displaying 1 - 3 of 3

last_girlscout said on December 19, 2009 at 8:56 AM

He calls himself a "gambino" but for those of us born and raised in Gambino country I can tell you - the damage does not come just from "drilling rigs dotting the landscape". Storing, transferring and the destruction caused by building do a helluva lot of damage. When the need i gone and the plant is closed - the company leaves the mess behind and it becomes another Superfund site. And besides, this is Oregon - might as well call it Ruby Ridge or Waco - to tell the locals they cannot control what happens on their land and in their town... even the conservatives may back that fight! Sure, 450 jobs,mostly awarded to out-of-staters that will move into the area. The Bubba's down there have no education... they work in restaurants and maybe saw mills or for the state - you think they're gonna get the new high-payin' jabs at the LNG terminal? They'll be working in the new restaurants and bars making minimum wage.

33976687
Flag this comment

shallowend said on December 18, 2009 at 4:27 PM

Let's ask the kids from Bellingham about the safety of burred pipelines! Oh, we can't. They're dead. FERC has already approved the route, and that gives landowners NO OPTION about allowing the line through their property, no recompense for the digging and destruction of landscaping and such, and no negotiation on how much the use of their land in perpetuity is worth. Sorry, gamb, but this is as much about property rights as environmentalism. Not to mention the issues of State's Rights.

33946909
Flag this comment

mgambino79 said on December 18, 2009 at 2:49 PM

Ya know, the longer I live here the more I think the governor is a moron. It's a terminal for goodness sake. It's not like there's going to be drilling rigs dotting the landscape. Tax and spend Teddy could even levy some taxes on the operation; knowing him, I'm sure he will tax it into oblivion if it does come to fruition. No...mustn't employ more people in this economy. Environmentalism has done wonders for our state's economy.

33941939
Flag this comment