
Local experts provide the latest information on Healthcare issues that matter to you
04:11 PM PDT on Tuesday, April 20, 2004
In a setback for gay rights advocates, Multnomah County Judge Frank
Bearden on Tuesday ordered the county to stop issuing marriage licenses
to same-sex couples.
The decision will likely be appealed, speeding the question of whether
gay marriage licenses are allowed under the state Constitution to the
Oregon Supreme Court for what could be a historic decision.
Bearden's action effectively ends gay marriage nationally. Multnomah
County is the only jurisdiction known to allow it until May 17. That's
when the state of Massachusetts is slated to begin approving same-sex
marriage license applications following a state Supreme Court ruling
there.
Bearden said Tuesday in his 16-page ruling that he believes the Oregon
Constitution would "allow either a civil union or (marriage) privileges
to same-sex couples" and recommended the state follow the example of
Vermont and agree to civil unions.
Ultimately, a state Supreme Court ruling is needed to determine whether
gay marriage should be allowed in the state, he said.
"Public debate and legislative action may be required to carry out the
court's mandate," Bearden said.
Bearden's decision also included an order that the state of Oregon
register about 3,000 marriage licenses from same-sex couples. The ruling
was hailed by gay rights supporters, who said those would be the
country's first legally recognized gay marriages.
Dave Fidanque, the ACLU executive director in Oregon, said the ruling
was important because it recognized the gay marriages that have already
taken place.
"In no other same-sex marriages that have taken place has there been a
court order saying the state must recognize them,” Fidanque said.
“That's what's truly historic about this opinion."
County Chairwoman Diane Linn, who issued the order allowing gay marriage
license applications, repeated her belief she had a duty to act on the
behalf of same-sex couples.
"This ruling validates Multnomah County's position of defending equality
under the Oregon Constitution," Linn said.
County commissioner Serena Cruz added, "We cannot deny same sex couples
access to the privileges, rights and responsibilities that are granted
to straight couples."
The judge also gave lawmakers 90 days after the start of the next
legislative session to fashion a law that "would balance the substantive
rights of same-sex domestic partners with those of opposite-sex married
couples." If no agreement emerges, Multnomah County can resume issuing
licenses to gays and lesbians, the judge ruled.
Legislators could convene in Salem as early as June, for a session that
was intended to focus on tax reform. But the future of that session is
in doubt, because of legislator disagreements on whether it is necessary.
The American Civil Liberties Union, representing nine gay and lesbian
couples, filed the lawsuit against the state and a group called the
Defense of Marriage Coalition to challenge an Oregon marriage law that
dates back to territorial days. The lawsuit has consolidated all the
arguments over same-sex unions in hopes of a quick ruling by the Oregon
Supreme Court.
Bonnie Tinker, of the pro-gay marriage group Love Makes a Family, was
critical of the judge's order to stop gay marriage in Multnomah County
for the time being.
"I am extremely disappointed that this will not continue until there is
an Oregon Supreme Court decision, especially when there is so much legal
opinion that it is unconstitutional to deny same-sex marriages in
Oregon," said Tinker, who married her partner of 27 years in the Quaker
Church last Saturday.
Kelly Clark, a lawyer for the Defense of Marriage Coalition, which
represents a group of pastors and lawmakers opposed to gay marriages,
said the primary concern of his group has been the process by which
Multnomah County commissioners decided for themselves what the law says
about gay marriages. He applauded the judge's decision to order the stop
of gay marriage licenses.
“We are particularly pleased that (Bearden) has said what we think is
very responsible, which is stop, let’s get this sorted out, let’s get it
up to the courts, let’s get a piece of this up to the Legislature, and
let’s have a reasoned, dignified public debate about these issues,”
Clark said.
“Judge Bearden is inviting the Legislature to take a central role in
fixing a portion of the statutes that he believes disparately treats
same-sex couples, the tangible benefits of marriage,” Clark said.
Multnomah County has been issuing marriage certificates to same-sex
couples since early March. Multnomah County commissioners Linn, Serena
Cruz, Naito and Maria Rojo de Steffey said they were upholding their
oath of office to uphold the constitution when they decided to sell
licenses to gay and lesbian couples. They also said they were following
the advice of their legal counsel and an opinion from an independent
Portland lawyer.
But the Defense of Marriage Coalition has argued the state has a right
to define marriage as the union between a man and a woman, as long as
other rights are not affected.
Since Multnomah County's controversial decision, Oregon Attorney General
Hard Myers issued an opinion saying that state statutes define marriage
as between a man and a woman, but the statute itself is likely in
violation of the constitution’s guarantees of equal protection under the
law.
Kevin Neely, a spokesman for the state Attorney General's office, called
Bearden's decision "a big step in what will be a bit longer process."
"Our goal from the beginning was to get a ruling from the Supreme Court,
but this initial ruling does provide at least some clarity and a
framework for moving to that next step," Neely said. "The real key here
is to give the Legislature an opportunity to craft a law that the courts
will deem constitutionally sound."
Neely said involved parties will have to discuss whether to expedite the
appeal to the state Supreme Court, bypassing the Court of Appeals.
Oregon Governor Ted Kulongoski has urged county commissioners and county
clerks to abide by the state statute until the courts issue a ruling on
the matter. Kulongoski has also said he opposes any state constitutional
amendment banning gay marriages.
Gay marriage opponents are attempting to place such an amendment before
voters in November but are waiting on the state to craft language for a
ballot title before collecting signatures to put the matter to a vote.
(The Associated Press contributed to this report.)
More Headlines...
Most Viewed Stories
Below is a list of the most popular stories read by our subscribers this week.
Police ID 2 killed in Canby Amtrak train crash
Ahoy! Pilfered pirate was stolen on a bet
Popular Stories






You must be logged in to contribute. Log in | Register Now!
You are logged in as screenname | Log Out
You are logged in, but do not have a "screen" name. Update Your Profile